Map reviews process

To improve the map review process and avoid unnecessary delays, we are implementing a more structured and efficient approach.

Our goal is to ensure that feedback is clear, actionable, and moves maps toward a final decision in a timely manner.

Below, we outline how we would like our veteran mapmakers to review new submissions in a way that is both welcoming to new volunteers and maintains a high-quality standard for maps that make it into the game.

All Reviews are done on our BAR Discord.

‍

Steps

1. Go to the dedicated #mapping channel on Discord
2. Create a thread where you attach and keep current map files of the project.
3. Ping the @mapper role which includes experienced map makers from our team.
4. Discussion about the map takes place in the thread so it stays contained.
5. When the map maker feels the map is ready, has received feedback it is ready, they ask for a formal review to have the map added - playable map file must be shared here
6. Map is added to the game or rejected with posted reasons, at least 2 reviewers have to weigh in for final approval, or @IceXuick if there is no consensus.

‍

Additional Notes

• Reviewers should ensure their feedback is well-documented and points to the mapping standards where applicable.
• Avoid moving goalposts as much as possible.
• Both reviewers and map makers are volunteers, so we must respect everyone's time by making reviews efficient and constructive.

‍